Media Release on 22 September 2004 by Ron Bowden MP, Opposition Spokesman for Ports

 

STATE GOVERNMENT CHANNEL DEEPENING WILL DAMAGE PORT PHILLIP BAY – SERIOUS DOUBTS RAISED ON ACCURACY OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS STATEMENT (EES)

 

With the opening of the panel hearing into the deepening of Port Phillip Bay, two of the State Government's own key environment advisory bodies have raised major concerns with the Environmental Effects Statement (EES) on the proposed project, Opposition Spokesman for Ports, Ron Bowden, said today.

 

Mr Bowden said that both the Environment Protection Authority and the Central Coastal Board have criticised the EES in written submissions.

 

Mr Bowden said in 1996, the CSIRO published a major study of the health of Port Phillip Bay.

 

The report listed the major issues of concern for the future and led to a number of initiatives being implemented by the previous Liberal Government, including the $12 million upgrade of the Western Treatment Plant”, Mr Bowden said.

 

Mr Bowden said, “Why isn't the State Government interested in looking at alternatives? Who are they trying to please or are they afraid of checking alternatives?”

 

Mr Bowden said the State Government will preside over an environmental disaster in Port Phillip Bay if it goes ahead with the simplistic plan to dig the channel as outlined in the EES without proper safeguards.

 

"Thousands of tonnes of toxic and poisonous heavy metals are expected to be disturbed in the Bay and dumped in a holding basin off Williamstown. This is a disgrace as well as being a serious potential health risk", Mr Bowden said.

 

Mr Bowden said the proposal to dump millions of tonnes of dredging spoil off Mt. Martha will severely impact marine life and could ruin recreational fishing in the Mornington Peninsula region of Port Phillip Bay.

 

Mr Bowden said we must now have an independent umpire, such as the CSIRO, to properly and objectively assess the environmental impact of the massive dredging estimated to total up to 40 million cubic metres of material.


The EPA and the Central Coastal Board's problems with the EES include:

*  A lack of understanding on the total impacts of dredging;
*  The lack of protection for the Bay in the proposed environmental management plan;

*  Insufficient evidence to support the conclusions that impacts are manageable and not only short term including the impact of relocating
    thousands of tonnes of poisonous metals

*  A significant under-estimating of the likely recovery time of sea-grass beds;
*  A failure to acknowledge and adequately deal with the uncertainties associated with the project, particularly the crucial processes that
    remove nitrogen and prevent algal blooms;

*  An understatement of the impacts on the ecologically sensitive southern areas of the Bay, including Marine Parks;
*  A lack of independent and continuous monitoring in the proposed environmental management plan.

It's now time for the CSIRO to provide its expert opinion on the propose channel deepening at Port Phillip Bay.

*''Ends"*

Media inquiries: Ron Bowden 5977 5606