![]() |
|
|
| A0020093K Victoria | PP2005A April 2005 http://www.vicnet.net.au/~phillip | |
| A
Mt Eliza Coastal Park: PPCC Inc. Urges State to Buy Key Ansett Land |
| Port Phillip
Conservation Council Inc. has written
to the
Premier, Hon Steve Bracks MLA, asking that the Victorian Government
publicly
acquire a 40 hectare area of attractive open space land at Mt Eliza for
a |
![]() |
| Foreshore
at
Gunyong Creek, Mt Eliza |
| PPCC
Inc. last year studied a report
endorsed by its Member Organization, Mt Eliza
Association for
Environmental Care Inc, that recommended that this land should
contribute
to a Mt Eliza Coastal Park. The report assessed the environmental
values of the
land, particularly the flora and geological aspects of the
well-vegetated
foreshore section, and provided good grounds for measures to protect
those
values. Furthermore this key parcel of coastal open space forms, together with adjoining open space, an approximately 200 hectare area of open space having a Green Wedge zoning that is some 2 kilometres in width from its boundary with the coast all the way to its 2 kilometre boundary on the Nepean Highway, which is a kilometre from the coast there. This Green Wedge land, which is part of the Green Wedge that runs further east, inland to the Mornington Peninsula Freeway, is by far the largest area of coastal open space between Melbourne and Point Nepean on the east coast of Port Phillip, and undoubtedly provides the main break in the 80 km long continuous intensively built-up area along the Port Phillip coast from the mouth of the Yarra River to the remnant open space at Point Nepean. By contrast, the western coast of Unlike public ownership as a Coastal Park held under the Parks Victoria Act 1998 (the basis of Point Cook Coastal Park’s tenure), or the greater security of explicit listing in the National Parks Act 1975, Green Wedge zoning by itself is not as secure a protection. There is an inherent conflict between the ambitions of the private owner and the public regulator that the public ownership arrangement is intrinsically free of. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| The
Planning Minister, Hon Rob Hulls MLA,
has released to the public the full report of the Independent Panel
established
to examine the The Victorian Government has been well served by the professionalism of the Independent Panel that it set up to advise it on the largest proposal in Victoria ever to have been subjected to EES scrutiny. The Government had, early in its life, revealed its view that the EES framework in |
|
|
| Mornington
Environment
Association Inc, a Member Organization of Port Phillip Conservation
Council
Inc, successfully alerted the Mornington community to the great
disadvantages
of an attempt, in 1993, by the Mornington Yacht Club to extend by
building a
marina in |
![]() |
| Mornington
Harbour-
Mothers’ Beach at top left |
| MEA
Inc’s success became evident in 1994 when,
after public input to a Panel, the then Planning Minister, Hon. Robert
Maclellan, wrote to the then Shire of Mornington stating that “… the option for a marina in Mornington
Harbour is no longer appropriate. Any future proposal for a marina in
the
vicinity of Mornington should be outside the MEA Inc. now opposes the Yacht Club’s new plans to replace 65 swing moorings on open water with 180 concrete pens for yachts and power boats, and build a big wave screen. PPCC Inc. has written to the Minister for the Environment, Hon John Thwaites MLA, giving its reasons for also opposing the plans. |
|
|
| Getting Around VCAT’s Order on Coastal Strategy: Rosebud Skateboard Ramp Saga |
The Tribunal ordered that the Council’s permit be set aside, and that no permit issue. It declared that weight had been given to the approval of the proposal given under the Coastal Management Act 1995, but that the inconsistency of the entirely non-coastal dependent nature of the skateboard proposal with the requirement of the Victorian Coastal Strategy 2002 that developments on the coast need to be restricted to coastal-dependent uses led to the decision it made. Less than two years after that ruling, the good principle confirmed might be circumvented by having the authority representing the Crown - the owner of the Foreshore Reserve, which in this new attempt is the Rosebud Foreshore Reserve - be the proponent of a skateboard proposal. The Shire required a permit under the Planning and Environment Act 1987, but the organization managing the reserve, Parks Victoria, can have a permit issued to it that is, under Section 97M of that Act, exempt from review. PPCC Inc. is obtaining advice on this matter. |
|
|